Test your processing power, photoshop required

[batmang]

http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1824629

check out the link above, it has all the details. how fast does your guys' computers apply the filter?

here are my results:

59 seconds

CPU: Intel Pentium D 925 3.0Ghz @ 3.6Ghz
Memory: 2GB DDR 400
Video Card: NVidia FX5500 256mb AGP (horrible card.)
OS: MacOSX 10.4.8 - Tiger (yep, osx on my pc. http://www.osx86project.org)
Version: Adobe Photoshop CS2

[Big C]

Damn your shit is quick!

2:12 for mine

CPU: Intel Pentium D 820 2.8Ghz
Memory: 2GB DDR2 PC5300 667Mhz
Video Card: PNY 6600GT 128mb DDR3 PCI-E
OS: Windows XP Pro
Version: Adobe Photoshop CS2

[Rufus]

Almost 10 minutes (not responding) lol Celeron D FTL

[Mafioso]

58 seconds

CPU: Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66Ghz
Memory: 1GB DDR2 (not sure the speed) Dell Laptop FTW
Video Card: 128MB Intel 950 Integrated Graphics (sh*t)
OS: Windows XP Pro
Version: Adobe Photoshop CS2

[RhdRicheeee]

damn I need photoshop

[Integra3586]

2: 01


cpu: AMD turion 64
dont know my video card
memory: 512mb
os: windows xp
version: Adobe Photoshop CS2

[batmang]

58 seconds

CPU: Intel Core Duo T2300 1.66Ghz
Memory: 1GB DDR2 (not sure the speed) Dell Laptop FTW
Video Card: 128MB Intel 950 Integrated Graphics (sh*t)
OS: Windows XP Pro
Version: Adobe Photoshop CS2

nice! 1 second faster than me... damn pentium D! i may have to add 100 more mhz... 700mhz overclock... i better not push it :P

[J_Bone]

42 seconds.
AMD Athlon Xp 3200 2.19GHz
1024 MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce4

Photoshop 6

[YewllowDA]

^ we had a winner!!lol
i need photoshop

[breeze812]

27 seconds.... the counting (one thousand one...one thousand two) method.... and it seemed slow.

Photoshop CS2
AMD 64 4800 X2 Toledo core
2MB Ram
Dual GeForce 6800 in SLI
2 Western Digital 250 GB SATA drives in Raid

[Integra3586]

i just tried again, it took ONE SECOND!!!!!!!!!!!

[97accord]

seriously this took 1 second

photoshop pro
intel celeron 2.40GHz
512MB Ram
Intel Extreme Graphics(integrated)

[97accord]

^ 1st try also

[Integra3586]

lol, i was just joking in my post.

i highly highly highly doubt yours did it in one second,especially with a celeron. did you set all the settings like you were supposed to?

[Mike]

48 seconds

CPU: Intel Pentium D 925 3.0Ghz @ 3.0Ghz
Memory: 2GB DDR 400
Video Card: GeForce 6200 256 PCI
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate
Version: Adobe Photoshop CS2

[Mike]

seriously this took 1 second

photoshop pro
intel celeron 2.40GHz
512MB Ram
Intel Extreme Graphics(integrated)

1 second with a 2.4 Celeron on only 512 AND an embedded vid card? Where's that bullshit flag?

I don't think a Core Duo or Quad could do it that fast.

[teemfedx]

took 141 seconds (2:21 seconds)

photoshop 7
2.1 ghz intel
ebay video card
windows xp pro

[aBeeZe97]

51 sec

CPU:dell 4600 p3
Memory: 2GB ram
Video Card: GeForce 6600 256 agp
OS: Windows xp
Version: Adobe Photoshop

[fivesfe]

i need photochop, why not just use a benchmark tester?

[batmang]

27 seconds.... the counting (one thousand one...one thousand two) method.... and it seemed slow.

Photoshop CS2
AMD 64 4800 X2 Toledo core
2MB Ram
Dual GeForce 6800 in SLI
2 Western Digital 250 GB SATA drives in Raid

just open your clock and show seconds. thats the most accurate way to do it :)

[batmang]

maybe we should do some sandra tests?

[Rufus]

Exactly 60 seconds

Dell Inspiron 9400 Laptop

Processor
Intel® Core™ Duo T2250 (1.73GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 533 MHz FSB)

Memory
1GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 533MHz

Photoshop CS

[batmang]

lets all download geekbench and post links of the results:

http://geekpatrol.ca/geekbench#download

pretty cool app, i scored 194.3 last time i tried. i will try again today and post a screen.

my last result when i was at 3.4ghz: http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15582

[Big C]

lets all download geekbench and post links of the results:

http://geekpatrol.ca/geekbench#download

pretty cool app, i scored 194.3 last time i tried. i will try again today and post a screen.

my last result when i was at 3.4ghz: http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15582


I tried this test and got 170.1. Is that good or bad?

[auex]

E6300 core2duo
junk mobo
512mb ddr400
38 seconds

same but with 2G ddr2 533 and a new raptor HD 36 seconds.

The geekbench scored a 166.9. What does this mean?

[auex]

seriously this took 1 second

photoshop pro
intel celeron 2.40GHz
512MB Ram
Intel Extreme Graphics(integrated)

You probably forgot to put the quality to best.

[Rufus]

My desktop got a 115.3 but my laptop should do pretty well.

[advert]

i got 191.5

not to bad for a year and half old budget machine.

[batmang]

the geekbench does a overall test on your pc. its cool because you can view the link it gives you and compare PER benchmark.

[advert]

so what does all this shit mean?

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=16057

i vote batmang a award for being a smart ass motha fucka.

[shadowed]

Ugh I've gone now two damn months without photoshop and it's driving me insane. My old laptop crashed and with it my photoshop (installed by a company so I didn't get a disk). And I'm still waiting on my CS2. That said, I'd love to test my new Macbook Pro. 2.33 intel core duo 2 with a huge graphics card and an ass load of memory and RAM. Oh I must know...

[batmang]

i just ran this again on my imac, finished in 42 seconds.

iMac 17"
2.0GHz Core 2 Duo
1GB DDR2 667MHz

[batmang]

them, i ran the new geekbench 2.0, scored 2683
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/4671

[Mike]

48 seconds

CPU: Intel Pentium D 925 3.0Ghz @ 3.0Ghz
Memory: 2GB DDR 400
Video Card: GeForce 6200 256 PCI
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate
Version: Adobe Photoshop CS2

Figured i'd bump this. Just upgraded to a Core 2 Quad and a Nvidia GeForce 9750 512MB PCIX

... 20 seconds

[batmang]

^^^ nice.

Still amazes me that the mac pro's do this in like 10-14 seconds.

[Mike]

Wow. Ive been thinking of running a dual boot of Ubuntu, it's suppose to be quite a bit less CPU hungry over XP/Vista. I wonder if there is a way to install Photoshop on it, it'd be nice to see the difference between the speed of it and Vista.

[honduh_head]

you guys are nerds...and i mean that in a good way...way more computer literate than i am

i have no clue wtf you guys are talking about

i can search with google like a mofo though :)

[Mike]

Been messing with Ubuntu for the last week or so. Finally getting it the way I want. Haven't had a chance to install Photoshop yet, but I did just do a Geekbench of each OS on the exact same hardware setup (dual boot).

Vista Ultimate 32bit: 3802
Ubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy) 32bit: 4275

http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/mdoyle/profile

I do notice that Ubuntu loads quite a bit faster than Vista. But there are a few things that Vista does so much better than Ubuntu. I'm gonna give Ubuntu a fair chance, probably use it for the next few weeks and go from there.

[DJ NeX]

GeekBench 2.0.5 Score 3149

OS: Windows XP 32-bit
CPU: AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core 64 6000+
Ram: 3GB

[batmang]

Mike, Ubuntu to me, is hands down the best Linux distro available. I've ran it many times over its years of being around. Its always refreshing to run Ubuntu after using Windows for so many years. I'm sure you've heard of Beryl/Compiz etc. Its very cool to use just to play with. Tons of cool useful features. As for getting Photoshop to work, its possible, but its buggy (in my experience at least) and much less of a headache to just dual boot for apps that are Windows native.

Here are some old pics of my previous Ubuntu setups:
http://www.jmbat.com/pics/main.php?g2_itemId=1102
O P E N SOURCE FTW.

And here was my Hackintosh setup:
http://www.jmbat.com/pics/main.php?g2_itemId=1375
http://www.msprotege.com/members/batmang/desk_macosx.jpg

http://www.msprotege.com/members/batmang/desk_macosx_tower.jpg

[Mike]

Yeah, this isn't my first time in Ubuntu, I ran Edgy and Feisty a bit to play around with it but always fell in trouble with Beryl/Compiz, and after they destroyed my xorg.conf file I decided to just stop messing with it. After getting the Quad, I figured i'd give it a real shot again.

I have Compiz Fusion running on this install right now, and it's setup in a way I like for right now. I know there are tons of things that you are able to do in Linux since it's all Open Source.

I do also agree that Ubuntu is the best Linux distro available right now. I played around with Fedora, CentOS, Debian and Gentoo a bit, but Ubuntu seems to be more user friendly.

How do you like Mac OSX compared to Ubuntu? Maybe i'll go for a tri-boot, and give it a shot too.

[batmang]

dood... Mac OSX FTMFW. I sold my rig after getting hooked on it, then I bought a iMac. Best move I've ever made. :)

[Mike]

Know of any good references on how to get it installed?

[DJ NeX]

Dude, that heatsink irks me for some reason....

[Mike]

Why? It looks like the same OEM one that came with my Core 2 Quad.

[DJ NeX]

I was never a fan of those...they don't strike me as something of quality... You're better off gettin' a Zalman or somethin'

[batmang]

it came with the cpu. and i ran that thing 600mhz over stock and it ran fine. 3.0 to 3.6Ghz no prob on the stock heatsink and fan.

mike: http://www.osx86project.org / www.insanelymac.com

[Mike]

Thanks.

[DJ NeX]

it came with the cpu. and i ran that thing 600mhz over stock and it ran fine. 3.0 to 3.6Ghz no prob on the stock heatsink and fan.

mike: http://www.osx86project.org / www.insanelymac.com

If you're at 3.6ghz why is my lil AMD benchmarking higher? I'm only @ 3.0ghz. I'm not a computer whiz by any means, but that's crazy. You got over half a ghz on me.

[Vtecracer]

Geekbench Score 2729

dont know if thats good because i am used to testing with aquamark and comparing that way

[Mike]

I just looked into Auqamark to see if I could do a test with it. They don't offer a Linux version of it, from what I could find at least.

[batmang]

If you're at 3.6ghz why is my lil AMD benchmarking higher? I'm only @ 3.0ghz. I'm not a computer whiz by any means, but that's crazy. You got over half a ghz on me.

Its all about the IPC's, Instructions Per Clock. Intels were and are the first to get really high processors speeds, but they did less instructions compared to AMD's chips. Basically, AMD's get more work done with a slower processing speed because they were more efficient. The pre Core 2 Duo cpu's took more processing power to get more work done. With the Intel Core 2 Duo's, its more similar to AMD's technology... just a shitload better. More IPC's, MUCH better multi-processing, just overall better technology. My 2.0Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo destroys my old Intel Pentium D 3.0@3.6Ghz setup by a long shot.

[DJ NeX]

I was thinking about about switchin' over to the Intel Quad, but I don't see a reason to spend a G on a processor. I'm gonna wait til AMD comes out with their quad core series and when the second price drop on the Procs come around, MAYBE I'll think about upgrading, but this system gets the job done well enough for me.

[Mike]

A Grand? You're nuts. I just spent $300 on a Quad, with a new Intel mother board at $120 from Fry's (mark up much?). Don't know why you think a Quad would cost you that much.

[DJ NeX]

If I'ma get me a quad its gonna be a Q8XXX

[Mike]

Well, if you aren't "much of a computer whiz" and your current system already "gets the job done", then why do you need a top of the line Quad processor? Seems like overkill to me.

[DJ NeX]

because, i'm like liquid. Ever changing, constantly moving, and fluid. If you will. I may say something one minute, and then totally say something else the next.

[xg1rgx]

i got 48 seconds with my macbook


but seriously does the finished result of the horse not look like a tit or am i just crazy?

[Mike]

because, i'm like liquid. Ever changing, constantly moving, and fluid. If you will. I may say something one minute, and then totally say something else the next.

That, makes sense :poke:

[batmang]

$290 +shipping for a 2.4Ghz Quad Core. (link (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017)) I just sold my iMac too. Why? Because I want a Quad core setup. $300 for a friggin QUAD core C2D.... badass.

[imm0rtal]

I'd kill for the cash to build a new rig, being able to process 246 billion calculations per second just isn't enough for me :(

[DJ NeX]

sooo....what was your score then?

[imm0rtal]

I dunno, never did it. All I know is my machine gets stable fps in Source when I need it and that works fine for me. I'll probably upgrade after UT3 comes out :p

[NtegraDryvr]

This test is kind of lacking but what the hell. I might as well post up my rig while i'm at it.

42 Seconds

:)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v113/NtegraDryvr/My%20Setup/IMG_00021.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v113/NtegraDryvr/My%20Setup/IMG_00031.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v113/NtegraDryvr/My%20Setup/IMG_00061.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v113/NtegraDryvr/My%20Setup/IMG_00071.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v113/NtegraDryvr/My%20Setup/IMG_00081.jpg

32" Samsung LCD HDTV
19" Samsung LCD Monitor
Yamaha 6.1 Receiver
Mirage Nanoset 5.1 Speaker System
-Computer
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
2Gigs PC3400 Corsair XMS Platinum Heatsink Memory
Geforce 7800GT PCI-E
2x Western Digital 250gig Sata II HD's w/ 16mb L2 Cache on Raid 1 (Mirrored)

Everything is networked, 360 to computer, computer to tv, computer to surround sound, 360 to surround sound :)

[boostedrex]

damn thats a bad ass setup

[auex]

E6300 core2duo
junk mobo
512mb ddr400
38 seconds

same but with 2G ddr2 533 and a new raptor HD 36 seconds.

The geekbench scored a 166.9. What does this mean?

New mobo, 2g ddr2 533 mem, and vid card.
Photoshop cs3 24sec
geekbench 1894
aquamark3 72k

[Downshift]

5:45

2.66GHz Pentium 4
384MB RAM
POS Dell Inspiron 5100
circa 2003

[DJ NeX]

Update on Score with "newer" drivers. Not the newest, but the score definitely went up.

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/17034

Geekbench 2.0 3565

Not too shabby for an AMD in this day and age.

[DJ NeX]

Scratch that, I'm up to 3589 now.

<3 AMD